Fishing line is an essential part of any angler’s arsenal, and choosing between mono and fluorocarbon can be a difficult decision. Mono (or monofilament) fishing line is the most commonly used type of fishing line.
It has been around for decades, and it is affordable and available in a wide variety of sizes and colors. Mono is strong, flexible, and relatively easy to tie knots with. It has the ability to stretch slightly when under tension, which can help absorb shock from strikes and provide some cushioning should you snag a fish or snag on the bottom.
Fluorocarbon fishing line, on the other hand, is made from a combination of polymers that make it much denser than mono. This gives it several advantages over mono when it comes to fishing.
Fluorocarbon sinks faster than mono, which makes it great for deep water applications. It’s also more abrasion-resistant than mono, meaning that it won’t break as easily if you get snagged or tangled in weeds or rocks. Additionally, fluorocarbon is almost invisible in water because its refractive index closely matches that of water.
When deciding which type of fishing line to use, anglers must consider many factors including cost, strength, visibility in the water column, abrasion resistance and knot-tying ability. Mono may be cheaper than fluorocarbon but it doesn’t sink as fast or provide nearly as much abrasion resistance. Fluorocarbon may be more expensive but its superior strength and invisibility underwater make it well worth the extra cost for some anglers.
In conclusion, there is no definitive answer to what fishing line is better – mono or fluorocarbon – since each type of line has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on what type of fishing you are doing. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your budget as well as your specific needs as an angler.